Sunday, December 29, 2019

The Mexican Revolution An Overview Essay - 1467 Words

The Mexican Revolution: An Overview Throughout its history Mexico has had many revolutions. The most famous perhaps is the Mexican Revolution from 1910-1920. The people of Mexico were getting tired of the dictator rule of President Porfino Diaz. People of all classes were fighting in the revolution. The middle and upper classes were dissatisfied with the President’s ways. The lower and working class people had many factors such as poor working conditions, inflation, inferior housing, low wages, and deficient social services. Within the classes everyone was fighting; men, women, and children all contributed to the fight for freedom from Diaz (Baxman 2). This revolution proved to be the rise and fall of many leaders. In†¦show more content†¦The Diaz regime had such control over the government though that no one was able to break into the system. This made the ambitious generation want to break in even more (Summary 4). An interview given by Diaz in 1908 was read by Francisco I. Madero and he was inspired to gather supporters to defeat Diaz in the 1910 election. In the interview Diaz said that he thought Mexico could handle free elections by 1910 (Summary 4). Madero was a strong believer in democracy and realized that Diaz had a monopoly with the government. Madero thought that Diaz should step down from office (Consul General 1-2). By the time 1910 came around Madero had inspired many citizens and had quite a group of followers. His chances for election were very good and Diaz got scared. Right before the elections in 1910, Diaz falsely accused Madero and had him thrown in jail. Diaz is once again elected as president. Madero was soon released and, learning of Diaz’s reelection, he fled to Texas (Summary 4). While there he stated that the elections were illegitimate and that he was the President Pro-Temp until new elections could be held (Consul General 2). He also wrote a document, wh ich called for a revolt on November 20, 1910 which marks the start of the Mexican Revolution (Summary 5). There were three very strong revolutionary groups throughout the revolution that contributed to the rise and fall ofShow MoreRelatedReginald Lewis II EVALUATION OF SOURCES: Gonzales, Michael J.. The Mexican Revolution, 1910-1940.1600 Words   |  7 PagesEVALUATION OF SOURCES: Gonzales, Michael J.. The Mexican Revolution, 1910-1940. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2002. Michael J. Gonzales, noted Peruvianist and author of two articles on copper mining in northern Mexico, in this latest book describes the revolution and provides extensive coverage (nearly one-third of the text) of the Porfiriato. Lucid, engaging, and containing interesting anecdotes, this political survey of the Mexican Revolution makes liberal use of relevant photographs.Read MoreSleuthing the Alamo800 Words   |  4 Pagesof the Texas Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc, 2005. Book Review Sleuthing the Alamo: Davey Crockett’s Last Stand and Other Mysteries of the Texas Revolution is more about the issue of racism than it is about history itself. The author does make several good points and gives historical documentation to back up his points such as the diary of Jose` Enrique de la Pena. However, the book has a lot of opinion mixed in with fact. Crisp does not get an overview of the battleRead MoreAffirmative Action in Universities728 Words   |  3 Pagesall over America and when the Industrial Revolution hit, higher education increased exponentially. Before the Industrial Revolution, most of the people in America were either artisans or farmers but the Industrial Revolution gave people a reason to get a higher education as America became the industrial powerhouse of the world. Soon a college education was almost needed to make it in the industrialized world. The problem was that most African and Mexican Americans were not able to reach universitiesR ead MoreLa Flor de Un Sexenio by Jennifer Rae Accettola: Article Analysis1389 Words   |  6 PagesRepresentation in Mexico Accettola, Jennifer Rae.La Flor De Un Sexenio: Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Tulane University, 1995. Print. Accettola’s analysis examines the place of Mexican women in Mexican Politics using case study related research, interviews and alternate literature. In the analysis Accettola uses a variation of 283 female politicians who have participated in Mexican government at elite levels and echelons; â€Å"just below what is considered the elite level† since womenRead MoreWhy Did The Mexican Revolution Start?1846 Words   |  8 PagesThe Mexican Revolution, Where they killed the country s longest serving president, 900,000 people lost their lives, and nearly every major revolutionary leader was assassinated. â€Å"Poor Mexico† so far from God and so close to the United States.† A quote from the long serving leader, Porfirio Dà ­az. Dà az served a record, seven terms as president of Mexico, resulting in a total of three and a half decades. How did Dà ­az serve such a long time? About 35 years to be exact. Well people say â€Å"Mexican presidentRead MoreMulticult uralism Is An Essential Symbol Of The Canadian Heritage And Identity Essay1106 Words   |  5 Pagesengage actively in discussion on diversity and multiculturalism at an international level. 3. To secure or meet the needs of diverse population. If we look at the Census program of Immigration and Ethno cultural Diversity in Canada, we can get an overview on immigration and ethnic ancestry. National House Survey-2011 tells that there are 20.6% foreign-born population in Canada and more than 200 ethnic origins. Freedom of religious belief and conscience is recognised in Article 19.6 of the constitutionRead More The American Renaissance Essay1168 Words   |  5 PagesWhitmans Leaves of Grass (1855). American Renaissance Literary Masterpieces The American Renaissance, a literary and cultural period circa extending from 1820 to the mid-1860s, gained inspiration from the unresolved issues of the American Revolution. The American Renaissance literary style was coined as Romanticism, an international philosophical movement that redefined the perceptions of Western cultures, and seldom refers to the preconceived notions of love. Some important authors arisingRead MoreHispanic American Diversity Paper1544 Words   |  7 Pagesthat within the Hispanic culture there are many different groups. The different groups have different linguistic, political, social, economic, religion, and statues. Most Hispanics see themselves in terms of their individual ethnic identity, as Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban, etc. instead of members of the larger, more ambiguous term Hispanic or Latino (U.S. Diplomatic Mission to Germany, 2009). Puerto Ricans Puerto Ricans are American citizens; they are considered U.S. migrants as opposedRead MoreThe Shadow Of The Mexican Revolution1764 Words   |  8 PagesIn the Shadow of the Mexican Revolution by Hector Aquilar Camin and Lorenzo Meyer tells a chronological story of contemporary Mexico from the fall of Porfirio Diaz in 1910 to the July elections in 1989. The time period that Camin and Meyer portray in Mexico is one of corruption, civil war, and failure. While Mexico would undergo an era described as the â€Å"Mexican Miracle† where the Mexican country would begin to see a positive output in the country, it would be short-lived and Mexico would continueRead MoreFood And Eating : Some Persisting Questions Essay1560 Words   |  7 Pagescultural context that it is in, which became important in â€Å"The Old and New World Exchange†, by Mintz, and â€Å"Maize as a Culinary Mystery†, by Stanley Brandes. These discuss the diffusion of foods after 1492 in different ways. The Mintz reading gives an overview of all of the foods spread from the Americas to the Old World, and vice-a-versa, but does not go terribly in depth on the social changes and effects of specific foods. Brandes focuses on the cultural impact of specifically maize on the European diet

Friday, December 20, 2019

Comparision Of Hamlet With Rosencrantz And Guildenstern...

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead (R and G†¦) by Tom Stoppard is a transformation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet that has been greatly influenced due to an external contextual shift. The sixteenth century Elizabethan historical and social context, accentuating a time of questioning had specific values which are transformed and altered in Stoppard’s Existential, post two-world wars twentieth century historical and social context. The processes of transformation that are evident allow the shifts in ideas, values and external contexts to be clearly depicted. This demonstrates the significance of the transformation allowing new interpretations and ideas about reality as opposed to appearance, death and the afterlife and life’s purpose to be†¦show more content†¦Claudius’ character demonstrates the theme of appearance or reality in Act One, through adopting an act as though he is grieving the loss of his brother. This is demonstrated in the line, â⠂¬Å"and that it us befitted/to bear our hearts in grief, and our whole kingdom/ to be contracted in one brow of woe†. However, his tone of sorrow is really an appearance, as it was Claudius himself who murdered Hamlet Senior. This is proven in Claudius’ soliloquy, the second climax to the play when he is praying. â€Å"O, my offence is rank; it smells to heaven†¦a brother’s murder†. His tone is filled with guilt and it is here the value of truth is displayed. Elizabethan’s would have seen Claudius’ deception and value the truthfulness of this climactic soliloquy, in a social context that recognised sin and believed in God’s punishment and reward. This is juxtaposed by Stoppard in R and G†¦ through using the Player to proclaim that everyone is acting. When Guildenstern asks the Player â€Å"aren’t you going to change into your costume?† the Player replies â€Å"I never change out of it, sir†. This concept symbolises how life is a continual pretence and we all play act the life roles that are predetermined. Hamlet also uses the players to determine the reality of the ghost reflecting how he is questioning reality in general. This can be linked with Guildenstern’s [Guil] speech in R and G †¦ about the unicorn and Guil, along with Hamlet,

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Time and Social Theory for Politics of Liberty- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theTime and Social Theory for Politics of Liberty. Answer: Introduction Change means the modification of anything over time. It creates a variation from its actual state to a more modern state. Modification took place in the life pattern of people from any aspect is referred as social change and every society, eventually, has to address it. Societies around the world are not the same as they were in their initial stage. Various studies conducted by the sociologists and anthropologists show the considerable change that took place over the history of mankind. These theories offer diversified reasons that caused the change over time. Various factors took active role in changing the societies, which may be cultural, technological, or economic; however, all of them relate the concept of invention, accumulation, diffusion, and adaptation. Human are considered as the only animal that has culture, which helps them in inventing new things that are accumulated by the society. These inventions are then diffuses from one group to another that ultimately lead to adap tation of the change. The theories of early 19th century presented a comparative study between the past and the present. The French philosopher of science, Auguste Comte first coined the term sociology in 1838. He defined society with the help of change stating the first stage as logical (Harp 2010). It reached to the present stage of positivistic through metaphysical as per Comtes explanation. All the theories that are proposed by sociologists and anthropologists are classified under five broad theories of social change that are, Evolutionary, Cyclical, Economic, Conflict and Technological theory of Social change. Evolutionary Theory Harvard Spencer was one of the first to propose the evolutionary theory to define the change in society. According to him, the change is inevitable and natural, something that gradually changes in a continuous state. Evolutionary school is divided into unilinear, universal, and multilinear. According to Saint-Simon, Comte, Morgan, Marx, and many others, todays modern society has eventually passed through some certain stages following an unilinear line of change to reach its ultimate development. Karl Marx divided the line of evolution into five stages that are primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, and socialism. Other have provided something similar to this. The current society is in the state of capitalism. Spencer on the other hand proposes a thought different to this that opposes the single line. Instead, he sees the evolution from the universal point of view. It states that the human group has changed from simple homogenous to compound heterogeneous one. Soci eties according to this theory does not have to pass through same stages around the world. However, they must follow a straight line of evolution (Offer 2010). White and Ogburn supported his view. Ogburn added the role of invention for supporting his view and pointed a lag in material and non-material culture. According to him, our technological innovation stays steps ahead than our non-material cultural development (Godin 2010). A more recent theory by Julian Steward challenges both the evolutions and proposes a multilinear approach. It calls for identification of sequential pattern in different culture. According to Steward, change can occur from different ways and can lead to separate direction. His theory identifies some of the universal traits such as simple to complex, urban to rural, or technological, which all are diversified in nature and these can be achieved by different ways with distinct society specific consequences (O'Brien and Shennan 2010). For example, todays Ameri can villages are more advanced in nature than some of the urban societies in the world. On the other hand, some of the rural societies might have attained complexity but have not attained technological innovation. Osman Bakar is one of the critics who attacked the overall evolutionary theory identifying its general approach in defining change. Anthony Giddens is another critic who rejected the evolutionary theories stating its inadequacy to understand social change (Sanderson 2015). Cyclical Theory Oswald Spengler and Arnold Toynbee are the pioneers of Cyclical Theory of social change. Both of them related social change with the human lifecycle that is birth, growth, maturity, and death. Similarly, societies and civilizations undergo same lifecycle of rise, decline, and fall. Spengler supported his theory with the evidence of Egyptian and Greek Roman civilization as they had risen, decline and fell (Adam 2013). According to his calculation, the modern western civilization is on its decline. He further promulgated his theory of challenge and response. It means only the one can cope with the changing environment may survive. American sociologist Sorokin provided modified cyclical theory that compares society to the pendulum of a clock. Similar to the pendulum, the society returns to the initial stage of its journey. While analyzing cyclical theory, Harper and Leicht (2015) stated the society as an organic system that are bound to undergo the stages of youth, growth, vigor, and se nility. Civilization takes birth from a fallen one, which again enters the same process and cycle of change. Another variant of the cyclical theory was proposed by Vilfredo Pareto, which was named asCirculation of Elites. It identifies the elites as the promoters of social change. According to him, major social changes occurs when one elite replaces one. Karl Marxs theory proposes something similar, where society ends with the attainment of socialism (Harper and Leicht 2015). Rise and fall of Soviet Union can be the best example in this case (McCauley 2014). Both the formation brought several modifications in the societies of the countries involved. They took birth in 1922 and disassembled the board on 1991. This reflects the whole lifecycle of the union over 70 years (McCauley 2014). Economic Theory The economic theory proposed by Karl Marx can be considered as the only economic theory of change as others failed to make any impact in the academic research. Veblens (2015) analysis of Karl Marx economic theory view the society from the economic perspective. Veblen narrates Marxs view on economy and society. According to Marx, the balance between the nature and society is maintained with the support of change. Marx divided the society into infrastructure and super structure and referred infrastructure as the production of the society and relations between the productions. Superstructure on the other hand is the social factors like ideology, legal, political, and religious institutions that maintains the infrastructure. A combination of means of production and mode of production comes together to materialize the productive forces. Marx identified production relation as the primary constituent of economic structure of the society. Hence, socio-economic balance is maintained by the st ate of productive force. It means that the production relation and productive forces are the determinants of social change and development. He further states the need of the society and the process of fulfilment of the needs. According to Marx, the production system all together is the lever of the social change that directs the change in the society, which is dynamic in nature. The production and technological order are determined by the need system. Humankinds material necessity on the other hand is the root that controls all other forms of life. Marx concludes from this that the change occurs through contradiction of forces. In Veblens (2015) words, Marxs economic theory states the social condition of the society is controlled by the economic factors. The economic need of the population brings the change in the society. However, Marxs economic theory was highly criticized by many as Marx stated the economic factors as the determinants of social change, which is partially true to the critics. They object Marxs statement of economic factor being the sole determinant of change. Economic growth of Rwanda can be cited as example in explaining the social change. The recent economic growth of the country is successfully addressing the poverty issue and reducing the percentage of their population that will in turn change the standard of living (weforum.org 2017). Conflict Theory Conflict theory of Karl Marx is another offshoot of his economic theory of social change that rejects the idea of social change without conflict. According to Marxist conflict theory, economic changes brings other social change through the conflict that will facilitate in transforming the society. Conflict is inevitable as the social economy is in a constant change and vice versa. Max Weber however, proposes his conflict theory basing on the conflict of power. His theory talks about the constant struggle of power in inter and intra societal level that transforms the society. Ralf Dahrendorf criticizes Marxs point of view based on economic resources, which will ultimately lead to grand conflict between the elite class and labor class. Dahrendrof places his view of conflict over power, which talks about the constant simultaneous conflict among different segments of society (Dahrendorf 2011). Percy S. Cohen opposes the social conflict as the sole promoter of change. He finds the incompe tence of the conflict as a promoter of change. According to Cohens viewpoint, a balanced conflict might lead to a balanced state in the society that might restrict change from occurring. He supports his thought societies with diversified regional, ethical or religious groups where promotion of change any kind of change. Moreover, conflict can both be cause and product for social change. The example of Venezuela can be the best approach to explain conflict. Food crisis they are facing is the result of wrong move taken by their government to stop farming and earn only by selling oil in the international market. It now resulted into conflict between the government and the citizens over price hikes, which may lead to change in the governance of the country (McCarthy 2017). Technology Theory Role of technological innovation in bringing social change is evidenced from the early prehistoric time. It is often confused with the material outcome that is not true. Technology refers to the use of knowledge in molding the natural environment and produce material goods accordingly to the convenience that will enhance human efficiency. Marxs theory of social change also incorporates technology, which is the scheme of mode of production. According to Marx, it forms the main basis for the change in society. It is the determinant of the mode of production and relationships and institutes constituting economic system. Ogburn argues that the change brought by the technology is the change in material environment hence changing the material culture of the society. It does not changes the society directly but takes part in the change by changing the material aspect, which in turn makes the society adapt to it. He gave nearly 150 such social changes that he encountered by the invention of the radio itself (Godin 2010). Modern day example can be cited from almost every aspect of human life. For instance, the modern political system in almost every part of the world is using the social media for communicating their agendas to the citizens and its major stakeholders. This proves the impact of technology on the society as it has changed the face of political system (Stieglitz and Dang-Xuan 2013). Specific example can be cited for the case of Philippine President Joseph Estrada in 2001 when his was undergoing impeachment trial. The people of Philippine came down to streets not more than two hours to show their anger against the corrupted government as the congress voted to set aside the key evidences against their corrupted President. It is due to the use of cellular message that was sent to all the citizens around the country (Shirky 2011). This fast conveying of message affected in the political system that day in Philippine. Conclusion The above-mentioned theories proposed by various scholars over time tried to explain the process and causes of change in the society. For instance, the conflict theories proposed by different scholars state that the conflict in the society considerably changes it. It may be a positive or a negative but change is inevitable. Now the conflict may arise because of various reasons, that might be economic or it might be for power and position, which ever it might be, it demonstrates the inefficiency of the system in sustaining humankind in their current state. Ogburns technological theory identifies technology as the promoter of change in the society. Other theories proposed various other reasons and process of social change. Hence, to stop the change from taking place in the society, all the factors taking part in change need to be constant. Now, technology, economy, conflict, progress, or anything that matters is impossible to control. Hence, it can be concluded that the social change i s also uncontrollable and every society is bound to change from its current state. References Adam, B., 2013.Time and social theory. John Wiley Sons. Dahrendorf, R., 2011.The modern social conflict: the politics of liberty. Transaction Publishers. Godin, B., 2010. Innovation without the word: William F. Ogburns contribution to the study of technological innovation.Minerva,48(3), pp.277-307. Harp, G.J., 2010.Positivist republic: Auguste Comte and the reconstruction of American liberalism, 1865-1920. Penn State Press. Harper, C.L. and Leicht, K.T., 2015.Exploring social change: America and the world. McCarthy, M. 2017.6 things you need to know about Venezuelas political and economic crisis. [online] Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/18/6-things-you-need-to-know-about-venezuelas-political-and-economic-crisis/?utm_term=.bf5718c5b3b5 [Accessed 22 Oct. 2017]. McCauley, M., 2014.The rise and fall of the Soviet Union. O'Brien, M.J. and Shennan, S. eds., 2010.Innovation in cultural systems: contributions from evolutionary anthropology. Mit Press. Offer, J., 2010.Herbert Spencer and social theory. Sanderson, S.K., 2015.Evolutionism and its critics: Deconstructing and reconstructing an evolutionary interpretation of human society. Shirky, C., 2011. The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change.Foreign affairs, pp.28-41. Stieglitz, S. and Dang-Xuan, L., 2013. Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework.Social Network Analysis and Mining,3(4), pp.1277-1291. Veblen, T., 2015.The socialist economics of Karl Marx and his followers. Read Books Ltd. weforum.org 2017.5 things to know about Rwandas economy. [online] Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/04/5-things-to-know-about-rwanda-s-economy/ [Accessed 21 Oct. 2017].